| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Pirate ship changes for Dominion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I haven't had time to read the whole thread but this bit caught my eye: Rattlesnake ò Speed: 94m/s max velocity, 0.136 agility, 99,300,000kg Vindicator ò Speed: 121m/s max velocity, 0.0924 agility, 105,200,000kg Seriously? The Blast...
- by Doc Brown - at 2009.09.22 16:37:00
|
2. Remove ships "parked" at a POS from scanner - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
there should be a scanner option that shows ships with pod's in them and ships with no pod. _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2006.11.02 21:02:00
|
3. Some ships missing the 50% HP boost - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ange1 Don't forget that Capital Ships seem to have had a 500% HP bost. My guess is that a coder mis-placed a decimal point somewhere. _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad i...
- by Doc Brown - at 2006.10.25 15:06:00
|
4. Modules off-line still using power - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Thanks for the info....though I think this is the better forum for that discussion than ships and modules. _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.07.11 05:18:00
|
5. Computer Voice - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Since I think the voices are computer generated on the fly (correct me if I'm wrong), wouldn't it be nice to tweak the voice? _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.07.11 05:14:00
|
6. Does CCP listen? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yes they listen, but they don't do every thing that is suggested. Man.. I'd hate to see that.......actually it would be kinda intresting for a day to see it, but then I'd like to go back to normal ________________________________________________...
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.07.11 05:11:00
|
7. Modules off-line still using power - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Since the latest patch, modules off-line still count as using power, thus preventing one from undocking if you are over on power. This is presently happening to me and my Helios. I have equiped a Covert-Op II cloak, Scan-Probe Launcher (off-lin...
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.07.11 05:06:00
|
8. FCC Rules being ignored by devs ! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Aldelphius Test SB 81Km range 800 EM 800 Exp 800 Kin and yep, 800 Thermal damage with an activation time of 8 sec and energy cost of 10 WTB: 8 of the TEST smartbombs (or a BPO) _______________________________________...
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.04.07 13:55:00
|
9. FCC Rules being ignored by devs ! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You were killed by a TEST smartbomb, likely he didn't mean for that to happen. _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.04.06 21:22:00
|
10. Exploit question - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I belive that you can work out how the exploit would work on Sisi then file a bug report about it. I wouldn't test on tranq though _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.04.05 19:50:00
|
11. Sisi must die - With titans and a freighter or two perhaps? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Phoenix vajaa bring a diffrent titan. that ones borring. I think that's the only one that's done. _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.04.05 19:49:00
|
12. Mobile S/M/L Warp Disruptor INFO LACKING!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not to mention that they do not work consistently at all. Are you supposed to be able to warp through a bubble? _________________________________________________ There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations.
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.03.01 20:33:00
|
13. Armour Hardners on Causing insane lag? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why was this even added? The hardner "shimmer" is next to impossible to see at low levels of zoom.. and totally invisible (at least to me) at medium to long zoom levels. Seems like a "Good Idea" that should have been left at the idea stage. ____...
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.02.03 02:01:00
|
14. transport ships, r&d and all that ;) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: El***ER so 6 hours after releasing you expect people to sell the new bpo or build ships from an unresearched bpo for the free market? Sure, why not? I've actually just heard of one of these being destroyed carrying a loa...
- by Doc Brown - at 2005.02.02 00:01:00
|
15. Oh and now comes the cloaking nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Snoy <SNIP> If you notice he didn't even mention smartbombs I did mention that I was using a very specilized setup. As should be obvious by now, the way to beat that setup is get father than 5km away and then ...
- by Doc Brown - at 2004.07.02 06:23:00
|
16. Oh and now comes the cloaking nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Snoy <SNIP> If you notice he didn't even mention smartbombs I did mention that I was using a very specilized setup. As should be obvious by now, the way to beat that setup is get father than 5km away and then ...
- by Doc Brown - at 2004.07.02 06:23:00
|
17. Oh and now comes the cloaking nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Doc Brown on 02/07/2004 06:20:01 Originally by: Snoy Edited by: Snoy on 02/07/2004 03:28:17 I was Doc Browns "target", Ill totally admit that. It wasn't suprise that got my blackbird, it was the whole smart bombs dont ha...
- by Doc Brown - at 2004.07.02 06:18:00
|
18. Oh and now comes the cloaking nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Doc Brown on 02/07/2004 06:20:01 Originally by: Snoy Edited by: Snoy on 02/07/2004 03:28:17 I was Doc Browns "target", Ill totally admit that. It wasn't suprise that got my blackbird, it was the whole smart bombs dont ha...
- by Doc Brown - at 2004.07.02 06:18:00
|
19. Oh and now comes the cloaking nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Doc Brown on 02/07/2004 00:36:14 I don't think cloaking needs another negative. The locking delay is pretty good as it is. I've used a cloaking device to get only 1 kill. With the delay from decloaking to module activation, my targ...
- by Doc Brown - at 2004.07.02 00:19:00
|
20. Oh and now comes the cloaking nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Doc Brown on 02/07/2004 00:36:14 I don't think cloaking needs another negative. The locking delay is pretty good as it is. I've used a cloaking device to get only 1 kill. With the delay from decloaking to module activation, my targ...
- by Doc Brown - at 2004.07.02 00:19:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |